Interactive Investor
Log in
Log in

Stockwatch: odds improving in favour of this former high roller

There have been periods of recovery at this famous company since the Covid crash, but analyst Edmond Jackson believes an evolving turnaround story could be about to get interesting.

16th August 2024 11:43

by Edmond Jackson from interactive investor

Share on

Gambling chips on a casino table

Is a turnaround at Rank Group (The) (LSE:RNK) worth backing?

Annual results to 30 June for this small-cap, casinos-to-bingo halls group show a recovery from the impacts of Covid and higher costs under inflation, also muted demand through the cost-of-living crisis.

With consumer discretionary spending stocks lately under the cosh, gambling would hardly appear a dependable play. But as one veteran Ladbrokes’ shareholder told me some 15 years ago: never underestimate the British gambling spirit. Ladbrokes, I recall, was a frustrating stock, and story to divine, but well-timed shareholders did eventually benefit from a takeover.

Financial growth of 10% and better

Underlying operating profit at this largest UK operator of casinos and bingo has soared 131% to £46.5 million – albeit only slightly ahead of expectations – on net gaming revenue up 9% to £735 million.

Care is needed with the numbers given material adjustments involved, although reported operating profit of £29 million improves radically on a £110 million loss in 2023.

Of concern is how an £8 million impairment relates to casino/bingo operations which failed to meet expectations. Yes, you can see through this to consider the continuing operations’ performance, but such impairment is a cost weighing on the business quite differently from an amortisation charge near £7 million.

If we therefore apply this impairment charge to £27 million of adjusted net profit, Rank is left with £19 million net profit and earnings per share (EPS) of 4p instead of 6p – hence a trailing price/earnings (PE) multiple near 19x. This would still be fair rating currently, if the business is gaining vigour as described.

When initially browsing through the report, it struck me how the new financial year has started well: net gaming revenue is up 10% in the first six weeks and against a strong comparator.

If recently published forecasts reflect guidance on separating out any future impairment, then targeting £32 million net profit in 2025 for EPS near 7p – hence a forward PE near 11x – is a bit rich. But if these adjustments are tailing off, Rank’s valuation starts to look attractive.

At 75p to buy currently, the stock also appeals in a long-term context: the five-year chart showing it has only just lately jumped off a 65p low earlier this month:

Rank share chart

Source: TradingView. Past performance is not a guide to future performance.

That’s not too far off the late-2008 low at around 50p, from where the stock rallied to a peak of 300p by early 2016. It is tricky to assume much from the past now that plenty of online gambling sites have sprung up, but Rank has capability here too.

All operations – especially digital – are performing well

Grosvenor Casinos - the largest multi-channel casino operator in the UK - constitutes 45% of Rank’s annual “net gaming revenue” and 51% of its adjusted operating profit after this segment advanced 42% near £24 million. This side has improved from “the impact of lockdowns, slow return of international customers particularly to London casinos, and a tightening of affordability restrictions”. Such a trading context has coincided with strengthening the management – a new managing director and operations director – helping customer engagement scores rise.

The CEO is calling for a law change to attract more international “high rollers” to its London casinos, which have to force customers to write a cheque instead of use credit. Visitors from the Gulf are nowhere near earlier levels.

Mecca Bingo at 19% of revenue has turned things around from a near £6 million loss to £4 million profit. Mecca has benefited from reducing the estate from 82 to 52 venues, chiefly driven by the pandemic albeit creating “a stronger and more competitive estate, higher visits and more attractive prize boards”. There seems a lot of customer churn however, given over 187,000 new memberships are cited - 44% of which are under 35 years old – yet only 1% growth in like-for-like customer numbers.

There is small Spanish operation, Enracha, constituting 5% of revenue albeit doing well at 21% of group profit.

While digital revenue rose 12%, its operating profit soared 79% to over £23 million as operational gearing kicked in. This affirms Rank’s competitive strength in digital, constituting 50% of last year’s profit. Management claims its digital cross-channel revenues outpace rivals due to an enhanced, proprietary technology platform – now also transferred to the cloud.

Moreover: “There are many technology developments in the roadmap over coming years to deliver a full cross-channel seamless experience and maximise this area of significant competitive advantage.”

Meanwhile, group central costs were kept in relative check, up 8% to £14 million.

The Rank Group - financial summary
Year to 30 Jun

2018201920202021202220232024
Turnover (£ million)691695638330644682735
Operating margin (%)7.25.44.5-28.213.6-16.24.0
Operating profit (£m)49.537.428.8-92.987.7-11029.4
Net profit (£m)35.929.19.8-72.166.2-95.712.2
EPS - reported (p)9.27.12.5-22.212.3-20.52.7
EPS - normalised (p)17.617.47.5-22.817.0-3.25.9
Operating cashflow/share (p)21.925.636.4-7.233.114.424.2
Capital expenditure/share (p)9.58.713.05.18.79.410.1
Free cashflow/share (p)12.416.923.4-12.324.55.014.1
Dividend/share (p)7.57.72.80.00.00.00.9
Covered by earnings (x)1.20.90.90.00.00.03.0
Return on total capital (%)10.07.74.1-14.513.7-22.63.2
Cash (£m)50.461.873.669.697.958.066.1
Net debt (£m)9.2-1.9296254162175-22.2
Net assets (£m)397398366361427325339
Net assets per share (p)10110293.777.191.269.472.4

Source: company accounts.

Locking in materially higher dividend yield

The proposed 0.85p a share dividend looks meagre relative to the 7p+ pre-Covid, but it is what the market expected in respect of the June 2025year, and Rank’s board intends to pay an interim dividend early next year. Mind that after a 20% dilutive share issue in November 2020, the pre-Covid payouts are no strict comparison, although payout capability is still notable as proof of a turnaround.

I estimate that if impairment charges tail off and genuine EPS trends towards 8p in the next two years, paying out half of that – assuming investment and debt reduction needs also fall – implies a dividend per share of around 4p, hence a yield above 5% for buyers currently at 75p.

Potential scope for such is shown by the latest cash flow statement, where cash from operations has soared 76% to £113 million. Currently, payout potential is limited by £48 million having been applied for investment and £60 million to financing – which did however include a net £14 million repayment of term loans.

Mind how intangibles constitute 132% of net assets

It is easy to assume from data tables that downside risk is checked by end-June net assets of £339 million, or 72p per share. Yet the balance sheet has £446 million of intangible assets.

With only £44 million debt (excluding leases) and £22 million net cash despite £153 million leases, it is curious how the net interest charge has amounted to £12.7 million. At least interest rates look set to continue easing, though given UK services inflation I expect this to take time.

Other possible downside risks include a cash-strapped Labour government introducing some kind of exceptional profit tax on gaming companies – which are performing well in a UK industry context but contribute nothing to genuine gross domestic product. Labour might also be persuaded by the social welfare aspect of gambling addiction versus the libertarian argument people should be free to choose their vices.

Warrants buy rating as an evolving turnaround

I would not expect Rank to become a genuine growth stock; my long-term experience of following this sector has involved too much volatile performance. Not only did Ladbrokes prove a frustration, but one also often had to engage in behavioural guessing as to when the proverbial “high rollers” would be visiting London and its casinos.

Mind how Rank has a 60% Malaysian shareholder, where such control can limit the stock rating but also adds long-term potential of takeover. GuoLine Capital Assets did raise its stake from 57% just over 60% last April.

Edmond Jackson is a freelance contributor and not a direct employee of interactive investor.

These articles are provided for information purposes only.  Occasionally, an opinion about whether to buy or sell a specific investment may be provided by third parties.  The content is not intended to be a personal recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument or product, or to adopt any investment strategy as it is not provided based on an assessment of your investing knowledge and experience, your financial situation or your investment objectives. The value of your investments, and the income derived from them, may go down as well as up. You may not get back all the money that you invest. The investments referred to in this article may not be suitable for all investors, and if in doubt, an investor should seek advice from a qualified investment adviser.

Full performance can be found on the company or index summary page on the interactive investor website. Simply click on the company's or index name highlighted in the article.

Disclosure

We use a combination of fundamental and technical analysis in forming our view as to the valuation and prospects of an investment. Where relevant we have set out those particular matters we think are important in the above article, but further detail can be found here.

Please note that our article on this investment should not be considered to be a regular publication.

Details of all recommendations issued by ii during the previous 12-month period can be found here.

ii adheres to a strict code of conduct.  Contributors may hold shares or have other interests in companies included in these portfolios, which could create a conflict of interests. Contributors intending to write about any financial instruments in which they have an interest are required to disclose such interest to ii and in the article itself. ii will at all times consider whether such interest impairs the objectivity of the recommendation.

In addition, individuals involved in the production of investment articles are subject to a personal account dealing restriction, which prevents them from placing a transaction in the specified instrument(s) for a period before and for five working days after such publication. This is to avoid personal interests conflicting with the interests of the recipients of those investment articles.

Related Categories

    Trading tips and ideasAIM & small cap sharesUK shares

Get more news and expert articles direct to your inbox