Edmond Jackson's Stockwatch: Is Lamprell a textbook turnaround?
20th May 2014 00:00
by Edmond Jackson from interactive investor
Share on
This article is for information and discussion purposes only and does not form a recommendation to invest or otherwise. The value of an investment may fall. The investments referred to in this article may not be suitable for all investors, and if in doubt, an investor should seek advice from a qualified investment adviser.
FTSE SmallCap oil rig maker respectable trading update along with a $120 million (£71.5 million) rights issue - to use for investment as its markets improve, to repay specific borrowings and provide working capital flexibility.
has declared aA rights issue is a typical feature of a company turnaround, but usually shareholders first want to see a new management team stabilise the situation.
Lamprell has the advantage of 35 years as a market leader in the Middle East, so this turnaround should not be complex - instead, it will be a case of getting the essentials of the business right after the previous management team went awry on various contracts and ran up debt.
Even so the rights issue terms - five shares offered for every 16 held, at a price of 88p - represent a near 40% discount to Lamprell's recent market price, as if the offer had to be priced attractively.
Consensus estimate | |||||||
Year ended 31 Dec | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 |
Turnover (£million) | 263 | 322 | 739 | 631 | 662 | ||
IFRS3 pre-tax proft (£m) | 17.6 | 41.7 | 40.8 | -71 | 19.3 | ||
Normalised pre-tax profit (£m) | 17.5 | 27.6 | 47.4 | -68.6 |  24.6 | 25.5 | 36.5 |
Normalised earnings/share (p) | 7.93 | 12.5 | 19.8 | -26.5 | 9.2 | 9.8 | 14 |
Earnings/share growth rate (%) | -17.3 | 58.1 | 57.9 | 6.1 | 43.1 | ||
Normalised P/E multiple (x) | 15.7 | 14.8 | 10.3 | ||||
Cash flow per share (p) | -6.61 | 67.1 | -19 | 54.1 | 22.5 | ||
Capex per share (p) | 5.05 | 7.14 | 15.3 | 4.37 | 3.32 | ||
Dividend per share (p) | 1.98 | 4.54 | 8.32 | 5.15 | 3 | ||
Dividend yield (%) | 2.1 | ||||||
Covered by earnings (x) | 4.5 | 2.9 | 2.5 | 4.7 | |||
Net tangible assets per share (p) | 65.5 | 81.6 | 74.9 | 44 | 53.5 | ||
Source: Company REFS. |
It most likely relates to recent delays in project awards meaning 2014/15 revenues will be slightly lower.
At end-2013, the group order book was valued at $900 million against $1.1 billion at end-June; however this is in context of a bid pipeline of $4.7 billion at end-2013 and $4.6 billion at end-June; so there is plenty of scope for order conversion despite the softer revenue trend.
In such circumstances the institutional owners may have pressed for this extent of rights' discount, as fair compensation until the turnaround is fully proven.
The matter was made plain in the outlook statement within Lamprell's end-March prelims for 2013. 88p appears a reasonable compromise without adding excessively to dilution.
Obviously per share forecasts will need adjusting in due course; the two forming the brokers' consensus in Company REFS (see table) were made last March and early April; however the essential trend remains, that management expects 2015 to be a defining year.
The price/earnings multiple should reduce usefully then (pre-rights, the forecasts implied a drop from about 15 near 10 times) and one broker also felt a 3p a share dividend is possible. Overall it looks very much in shareholders' interests to take up the rights offer although you could also sell your "nil paid" rights for the difference between 88p and the prevailing market price.
I drew attention to Lamprell at 110p on 4 January 2013 along a recovery theme after a banking-waivers and contracts update provided early-stage evidence the new team was getting to grips.
Restore earnings and dividends
Assuming supportive demand for its services it should be possible for Lamprell to substantially restore its earnings and dividend capability - although 2011 was likely an exceptional year.
Oil prices are remaining firm partly in response to the Ukraine crisis and without a nasty surprise from the Chinese economy they look unlikely to plunge. Shale gas is the contentious issue: whether it increases spare global capacity of oil and gas or proves insufficient to meet demand growth.
Yet the industry remains busy thereby offering Lamprell the opportunity to leverage its strong market position - especially in new build jack-up rigs and offshore construction markets. Current strategy prioritises existing markets for rig construction and refurbishment, with better productivity and an improvement in service to ensure customer satisfaction.
So while Lamprell's chart has looked unexciting for the last 18 months, the current period looks useful to accumulate Lamprell while the stockmarket plays a waiting game for more proof.
Valuation is largely about earnings in the absence of a dividend and lack of tangible asset backing versus the share price; so the crux is how margins and (eventually) revenues pick up to impact earnings per share.
The management appears to be doing well under a new chief executive since March 2013 and in key respects Lamprell is becoming a textbook turnaround.Its 2013 results showed profitability restored, on flat revenue, and reassurance that a high level of bidding activity should translate into contract wins. It being difficult to assess competition when watching from the side-lines is another reason for the extent of rights' discount.
With fresh money it will be interesting to see what extent of rights' take-up by management is confirmed next month; if they are genuinely confident then they should push by whatever means (e.g. personal borrowings) to ensure this. Otherwise there has not been recent evidence of director/senior manager share buying.
The medium-term trend quite depends also on general "risk-on, risk-off" sentiment swings, so if you are cautious that stockmarkets may be exposed to volatility this summer then maybe watch and wait for dips to average-in.
Last year's interim results were end-August so some potential investors may prefer to see more proof of the contracts promises, which could also keep the share price muted until then.
But overall the risk/reward profile on the stock looks to be improving and it should be possible to target double-digit upside for the medium term. It is likely going to need something unexpected in the wider economic and political context, to provide another bout of jitters.
For more information see lamprell.com.
These articles are provided for information purposes only. Â Occasionally, an opinion about whether to buy or sell a specific investment may be provided by third parties. Â The content is not intended to be a personal recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument or product, or to adopt any investment strategy as it is not provided based on an assessment of your investing knowledge and experience, your financial situation or your investment objectives. The value of your investments, and the income derived from them, may go down as well as up. You may not get back all the money that you invest. The investments referred to in this article may not be suitable for all investors, and if in doubt, an investor should seek advice from a qualified investment adviser.
Full performance can be found on the company or index summary page on the interactive investor website. Simply click on the company's or index name highlighted in the article.
Disclosure
We use a combination of fundamental and technical analysis in forming our view as to the valuation and prospects of an investment. Where relevant we have set out those particular matters we think are important in the above article, but further detail can be found here.
Please note that our article on this investment should not be considered to be a regular publication.
Details of all recommendations issued by ii during the previous 12-month period can be found here.
ii adheres to a strict code of conduct. Â Contributors may hold shares or have other interests in companies included in these portfolios, which could create a conflict of interests. Contributors intending to write about any financial instruments in which they have an interest are required to disclose such interest to ii and in the article itself. ii will at all times consider whether such interest impairs the objectivity of the recommendation.
In addition, individuals involved in the production of investment articles are subject to a personal account dealing restriction, which prevents them from placing a transaction in the specified instrument(s) for a period before and for five working days after such publication. This is to avoid personal interests conflicting with the interests of the recipients of those investment articles.